OPEX Top 10 Transformational BS (Bogus Statements): People don’t like Change
In
previous articles we have previously looked at “Change Fatigue”, “Outsourcing”,
delegating to PMO and the “infamous” Law of Diminishing Returns. This latest BS
statement - that People don’t like Change - has been around for quite some time
and is a classic self-fulfilling prophecy; it means many organisations start on
the “back foot”, i.e. assuming that this will be the case and coming up with messages
that drive people to think “oh, here we go again…”
Type
“People don’t like change” into a search engine and you will find plenty to
read, some of it will be backed by research, some of it just “hear say” or
“Urban legend”. The fact is, people love change. Human History is a collection of countless changes
made at various levels and over various time frames. Descartes famously said, “I think therefore I
am”, and we should be under no doubt that he is thinking about change or
something that will drive the need for Change.
Here
are 5 reasons why we hear “people don’t like change” and why this is, in fact,
quite the contrary:
Reason No 1: Autocratic behaviour
People don’t like being
changed. This is very different to saying
people don’t like change. However, many transformation programs, even if they try to look
otherwise, are very prescriptive in terms of the “What”, the “How”, the
“Where”, the “When” and the “How much”. In such transformations, all the
thinking is done by the few and all that is left for the majority is to execute
according to the plan. Can you imagine
how frustrating this can be, especially if the plan is less than optimal? So,
if this is the case, what is the solution? If you believe you have the right people, why
not provide them with the “What” and let them figure out the rest! If your arguments are sufficiently convincing
people will work out the timeframe and how to do it, especially if you equip
them with the right methods and the appropriate empowering company culture. The
more attractive the “What”, the faster it will happen.
Reason No 2: Readiness for Change
The
big question that is not often considered is whether the Organisation is ready
for Change. So let’s look at what we call the Instability Factor, an assessment
that can be applied at an individual or group level and which is based on the
principle that the more unstable we are, the more we are willing to change. Few
organisations consider this natural human characteristic and those which do
still often get it wrong; they
use arguments that have nothing to do with their people. The Instability Factor
(IF) makes you think in 4 dimensions, 2 are drivers for a better future, 1 is a
driver to be dissatisfied with today’s current state and 1 is about how we feel
during the change. Put in mathematical terms we have the following definition:
Instability Factor
=
Vision of a better future
+
Dissatisfaction with current
situation
–
Financial cost of change
–
Emotional cost of change
Is
it any surprise that people don’t like change, if you look at it this way? Using
a scoring system from 1 (bad) to 10 (good), lets work out the score for someone
who thought the vision of the future provided was poor (4), was fairly
dissatisfied with current state (3), was not financially impacted by the cost
of change (0) and was not reassured about how change would happen (8). Their IF
would be 4+3-0-8= -1. Hardly any reason to be engaged, right?
Reason No 3: No opportunity to get on the bus
We
often use the sentence “If you are not happy, you can get off the bus”, the bus
being the company you work for. But what
about the opposite? What about the
ability to get on the bus, the bus being the group of people inside your
company trying to make the Change? We
often forget that we employ people to do a certain job and if you look at DiSC
theory you will see that 60% of people like Stability, 30% are Cautious, 7% are
Intuitive and 3% are Dominant. In other
words, only 10% of your organisation is likely to embrace Change very easily
and the vast majority will either protect what they have or need time to weigh
the good vs the bad. That’s what you want if you are trying to run a company,
right? If all your people were of the Dominant or Intuitive type, you would not
have a company as people would be spending their time just trying to change in
an uncontrolled manner! Just like the shirtless dancer video (https://youtu.be/fW8amMCVAJQ) you need to get the people to come and watch then nurture
the first few followers so that the rest of us think it is either cool to join
in or very bad to be the few that don’t.
Reason No 4: Having a “Change Management” box in your Transformation
plan
I
once had a boss who said, “you know you have failed when there is a change
management box in your plan.” He was right; if people don’t decide for
themselves that they need to change, there is little you can do to make it
happen. All activity that you put under
that box is just you planning to make yourself busy at being busy! Now this is not to say that you should do
nothing to help people change, rather it is about being clear that you can
either talk about it or simply do it: the simpler it looks, the easiest and
fastest it will happen.
Reason No 5: When Change is the exception rather than the
norm
Everybody
knows and accepts (whether happily or not) that change needs to happen faster
and faster. The problem lies with the time it takes to get started and the time
it takes to wind down. Think of it as Return-On-Investment (ROI), i.e. look at
the energy spent getting a Change initiative started and to winding down vs the
actual change made. Was it worth all the talk, all the planning, all the
communications, all the meeting, etc? Unless companies find a way to be in
permanent change, you will never stop hearing that “People don’t like Change”.
What’s surprising is that there is a solution to it and it has been around for
a while: it’s called the Business System approach. Look at companies such as
Danaher, Ingersoll Rand or Toyota. Stop
looking at the GE, Motorola or Allied Signal models, which were very successful
only when there was significant external pressure and time to change.
In
conclusion, if you ever hear someone say those words again just remember that
they probably did a poor job in creating the right environment for change. They
probably adopted an out-of-date state of mind that came from the early
industrial revolution days, where employee just did what they were told or
forced to do. They probably followed a
deployment model that is no longer fit for purpose and they probably got caught
up in tactical incremental change when what they sold was strategic
breakthrough change.
If
you’d like to know more about how we help leaders and employee of organisations
embrace change and create Transformational Business Systems why not have a chat
with us at the Amsterdam PEx conference later this year.
In
our next issue, we’ll look whether Digital Transformation is all about the
Technology.
Thank
you for reading, and please feel free to provide feedback at Anthony.shingleton@ibm.com
or through my Linkedin profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonyshingleton/